A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between future neighbours more than the construction of the wall at a coastal website inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide consideration subsequent an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Instances short article about René Collier and the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has developed right into a hugely publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design operates at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, look for to create their household residence. The case happens to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, in which enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of established residents. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their potential neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Highway, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their preparing authorization by developing a wall further than the boundaries in their web site, leading to an encroachment with a Exclusive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, as such places are subject to demanding controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have Long lasting ecological outcomes, specifically in the sensitive coastal ecosystem for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that's partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The couple accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal organizing disputes, in which sights of the sea are the two extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable endeavours with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the location, In line with sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances, an image which has due to the fact develop into emblematic of the intensity with the dispute. These steps were not simply symbolic; they ended up meant to gather Visible proof on the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website through the sea Irish Periods described, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the drinking water during serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become The most striking descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of steps were cited to display the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into an area influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined in detail because of the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to further submissions on whether or not interim orders should be granted to halt development pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential instant inside the authorized timeline.
On the core of your dispute is often a disagreement more than boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was approved and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and problems hooked up into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental protection and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've described their lengthy-standing link to the region as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair basically looking to create a family members house in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that all works happen to be carried out determined by Experienced suggestions and approved designs. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include coming into the sea throughout a storm, do not alter the fundamental facts.
The situation has also raised broader questions on how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute about construction of wall at coastal web page is becoming a shorthand description to get a condition that lots of observers see as significantly frequent. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between non-public land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become additional Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site contentious.
The Irish Situations write-up about René Collier mentioned the businessman experienced previously been involved in area advocacy on preparing and environmental concerns, nevertheless not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from pretty various professional backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, have become synonymous With all the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website in the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-higher water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments and René Collier waded by means of midsection-significant h2o through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Moments are phrases that appeared continuously in coverage, reflecting both the Actual physical reality from the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
As being the High Court proceedings continue, the result stays uncertain. The court will have to ascertain whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Unique Space of Conservation has happened. The legal arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and organizing ailments. But the human ingredient remains central: neighbours who will have to live along with one another extensive once the lawful expenditures are actually compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design functions at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong further than that handle. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. Furthermore, it underscores how immediately an area disagreement can escalate when essential challenges such as environmental protection and property legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of pure magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre from the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful inquiries. No matter whether it'll ultimately be altered, taken out, or done as prepared will rely on the court’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely viewed preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.